Website information
Editorial and Corrections Policy
Last updated: 2026-09-13
Who we serve
Brand Tool Guide serves founders and owner-operators of small physical-product brands. Our aim is practical help with product pages, email marketing, product content and software decisions.
Evidence and useful guidance
We distinguish observed facts, supplier claims, judgments and hypothetical examples. Material software claims should identify suitable sources and important limitations. Testing accounts should explain what was actually tested and the limits of the exercise.
We do not claim hands-on experience, customer results, traffic or product performance that we have not established. If information cannot be confirmed, we should say so or leave it out rather than invent a detail.
Commercial relationships
Commercial relationships should not override a useful, accurate assessment. Guidance should explain unsuitable use cases and relevant alternatives, including when an existing tool is sufficient. We do not promise that every article covers the whole market.
Our Disclaimer and Affiliate Disclosure explains the current funding status and how future commercial relationships will be identified. There is no option to buy an undisclosed positive review.
AI assistance and illustrations
AI may assist drafting, organisation and illustration. Its output is not independent evidence. Material factual statements need checking, and hypothetical examples or generated illustrations need appropriate labels. An illustration is not proof that we used or tested a product.
Corrections
Email hello@brandtoolguide.com with the page URL, disputed statement and supporting information. We will assess the substance and correct material errors we identify. A request does not guarantee agreement or immediate publication of the requested wording.
Where a correction materially changes a recommendation or factual account, the article should explain the change. Minor spelling or formatting changes may not receive a separate note.
Review dates and scope
An article's publication or review date indicates a particular review, not continuous monitoring. A footer copyright year is not an article-review date. Software changes frequently, so verify consequential details with the supplier before acting.
This is a small independent publication, not a claim that a separate testing team or formal review department exists.
